Line of Sight
A blog about Game Design and Unity3D.
Sunday, March 2, 2014
Deck of Many Things
The first game comes from the concept of time travel. I've always been fascinated by the paradoxes and cascading effects of time travel shows, books and movies. To my wife's frustration, I'm always yelling things at the screen like "why don't they just go back to the beginning of the episode and redo it?" Now I had an opportunity to explore all my crazy ideas.
All games are a series of cause and effect, and the time element creates a neat representation of the state of play. By changing a cause earlier in the timeline, the effect of their change would ripple down the line to modify cards further in the future. Because you're all time travelers, you can see the effects of a particular timeline and count up the bonuses at some future date.
I've gone through many iterations at this time (hundreds of destroyed note cards) and there are some really important things learned along the way:
We originally had a single timeline that each player could hop into and alter. They would do so by modifying one of several historical figures. When you modify it, you count up points (like suits) along the timeline to get a final value. It had some good moments: you could turn Einstein into a king, but it took too long to calculate the values and that part wasn't fun.
Tracking items in a line can sometimes lead to having to track multiple numbers in your head. People can't really track more than 3-5 numbers at a time, and you could easily mess up the value and get an entirely different outcome. At that point, you relied on other players to catch you and pay attention, which is not how I wanted it to work.
To fix there problems, we separated the timelines and reduced card effects to only affect adjacent cards. Clearer labeled values (colored pips) on each card help players more easily visually identify their current values.
With these changes, the game runs much smoother, and player can focus more on their strategy, and crazy histories rather than the mechanics.
Monday, February 3, 2014
Morality in games
In an effort to make better moral choices in games, I've spent some time doing research on morality. I found two good books that helped me, and I'd like to share them.
The first book is The Moral Landscape by Sam Harris. In his book, he writes about how we evolved as moral creatures and defines morality in a graduated scale. The somewhat controversial stance states that we can actually measure morality in a objective manner, rather than the typically subjective way people define morals within individual societies. The key premise that struck me was how you could get this measurement. He begins by posing that a moral society is a measure of the amount of human suffering that occurs within it. The worst state of morality would be a society that creates the most amount of suffering for the maximum amount of it's populace. From there, you have societies that create less suffering for an increasingly larger set of the population. These creates a series of peaks and valleys of societies that are more or less moral.
The second book is Moral Minds by Marc Houser. This book focuses on how we make choices on moral issues. This makes it especially interesting as the psychology can be directly applied to how you can predict players will behave. One of the more interesting aspects of the book discusses how politics is an extention of our morality. The two main stances discussed include the authoritarian (conservative) and anti-establishment (liberal) members of society. I found it interesting how the authoritarian approach has an inherent advantage, given that our minds evolved in a world where we listen to our parents to avoid dangers in prehistory.
A couple of ideas that came from this research:
Moral choices should impact the experience in an expected way, but still surprise the player.
Moral choices are more interesting when there is not a clear definition of good and evil choice.
Saturday, February 1, 2014
Cutlass and Compass
Currently, I've got a large number of systems built as well as the underlying framework for HUGE levels. Finished systems so far include:
Level Generator for reusing chunks
AI Task Managers so the pirates get tasks
Various Managers for updating tiles, harvesting tasks, animated assets.
Inventories, chests, drag and drop features
Saving!
I'm really quite excited to get into the nitty-gritty of gameplay. First on deck, ships and sailing! Time to build a ship controller and AI.
Thursday, August 25, 2011
FPS Melee
For a long time, the technology for respectable dynamic animations has been non-existent, forcing each character into his own bubble of personal space. These bubbles would prevent the larger number of interactions that would be taxing on animators, sprite artist, and designers. Well, we’re now way beyond the technological limits and we're beginning to see more and more melee monsters breaking into that personal space. From a design perspective, we must also recognize the problem with implementing mechanics like these. In the movies, when the monster has gotten close enough to grab you, you’re probably not going to survive to the credits. A good balance between the intensity of a truly in-your-face encounter and the ability to come back from being pounced on will require walking a thin line. Use this mechanic too frequently and the player will feel bogged down or frustrated with his loss of freedom to move; use it too little and it becomes a monster’s special move.
Two currently unreleased titles, Dead Island and Alien: Colonial Marine, show what the first baby steps of a new melee mechanic may look like. In both of these games, when a zombie or alien gets within a certain distance, it triggers a cinematic animation sequence showing the foe being held back by the protagonist, the enemy bearing its teeth in full fury and looking like it's ready to break off a piece. This quick-time-like event isn’t that new, and even dates back to Resident Evil. The big change is what the camera brings to the level of immersion a player experiences when facing an opponent (not to mention the pacing differences between RE and your typical FPS). I for one am really looking forward to this next step in this style of immersive FPS Melee.
So what do you think? Do these new mechanics help melee feel more cinematic and should that quality be desired in games? Given that most fist fights end in a wrestling match, what can we expect in the future?
Monday, June 14, 2010
Introduction: My Life in the Game Industry
This blog will primarily serve to document progress on my game(s) and any additional resources I find for mastering Unity 3D. From time to time, I also hope to report on other games and mechanics that catch my eye. I am a huge game mechanic junkie and a fan of board/roleplaying/and tabletop miniatures wargames, so I'll likely be commenting on something from that line here and there.